Validation request met with subpoena ‍♀

[pctechtv]

Slight spelling differences alone won't typically get you out from answering the lawsuit. What the court looks at is whether the correct person was served, not whether the plaintiff got the name exactly right. The misspelling will require the plaintiff do a little more to convince the court you're right defendant if you contest it.

The plaintiff claims they left papers with a person I DO NOT KNOW. Like I said my tenant and my neighbor gave me Notarized Affidavits that state that this person is not known. However, the plaintiff is claiming a person accepted papers on my behalf but the name on them is not exactly mine. Is that valid in any way?

 

[Zigner]

The plaintiff claims they left papers with a person I DO NOT KNOW. Like I said my tenant and my neighbor gave me Notarized Affidavits that state that this person is not known. However, the plaintiff is claiming a person accepted papers on my behalf but the name on them is not exactly mine. Is that valid in any way?

Asked and answered.

 

[Tax Counsel]

I've already discussed the name spelling issue on the subpoena. The other issue is whether the service was good. If they served someone who is not a proper person to serve on your behalf the service wouldn't good and the subpoena wouldn't be effective. What relationship to you is the person who accepted service and is the address at which service was made either your home or place of business?

 

[pctechtv]

I've already discussed the name spelling issue on the subpoena. The other issue is whether the service was good. If they served someone who is not a proper person to serve on your behalf the service wouldn't good and the subpoena wouldn't be effective. What relationship to you is the person who accepted service and is the address at which service was made either your home or place of business?

Yes, it is my home address. However, the person is not someone I know. I have Affidavits from two people saying that he is not known to the address or neighborhood. Thanks

 

[army judge]

Yes, it is my home address. However, the person is not someone I know. I have Affidavits from two people saying that he is not known to the address or neighborhood. Thanks

If you're lying or attempting to avoid/evade service, you're wasting your time. In fact, you're heading for a massive, brutal, beatdown.

If your story is 100% accurate, hiring an attorney might prove to be extremely beneficial to you.

If you developed food poisoning, accidentally ingested 8 ounces of bleach, or a cut on your arm festered and you developed SEPSIS, would you seek a solution/cure on WEBMD, or hot foot it to a nearby emergency room?

Apply the same logic to your perceived legal dilemma!

 

[Redemptionman]

AMEX and Discover are two companies that will come after you for bad debt. If you want to default on something, never default on those two companies.

 

[pctechtv]

AMEX and Discover are two companies that will come after you for bad debt. If you want to default on something, never default on those two companies.

It seem like just like other companies AMEX sells the debt to companies and they get to come after and still call it AMEX for credibility.

 

[army judge]

they get to come after and still call it AMEX for credibility.

No, its still AMEX debt, with another entity doing the heavy lifting for a cut on what is eventually collected.

 

[pctechtv]

No, its still AMEX debt, with another entity doing the heavy lifting for a cut on what is eventually collected.

That makes sense based on what I am seeing. Thanks

 

[pctechtv]

I got passed the default judgment, as explained to me today.