Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to our legal community! Click here or the create new topic button to ask a question and receive answers and comments from our friendly and helpful legal community.
Articles that answer frequent legal questions are in our Law Guide. Important legal news is reported in The Law JournalYou can find a lawyer near you in the Lawyer Directory. If you know that you need to hire an attorney, you can submit a case review from a lawyer.
He's made a better AG than I suspect Gaetz would be. Trump shouldn't be trying for a race to the bottom (as some reports suggest he is intentionally doing with the Gaetz nomination) but rather looking to elevate the best and brightest for these important positions. I don't very many would truthfully say Gaetz fits into the the category of our best and brightest, or that he even comes close to it. Trump wouldn't have to look far to find someone better for the job than Gaetz.What about this vile, weasel like, worm?
LOL, you are again trotting what the far right talking heads say with out the evidence to back it up. So long as the prosecutions against Trump were supported by sufficient evidence to get past a motion to dismiss there wasn't anything wrong with prosecuting it. If there wasn't the evidence then they should never pursued it in the first place. If they did that, the proper response is do the same thing back. If what the other side did was wrong, committing the same wrong back to get vengence is also wrong. That's the rationale behind the long standing truth that "two wrongs do not make a right." Trump and his team accomplish nothing for the public by wasting time and public resources pursuing petty revenge. Trump will come out much better if he can rise above that kind of nonesense and instead ensure that the DOJ does the job it is supposed to do rather than being political hitmen for him. I have my doubts that Trump can do that, but I'll applaud him if he actually comes through and decides to focus on governing the country fairly and not occupy himself pursuing individuals he thinks have slighted him. Sure, people get some measure of delight thinking about pursuing revenge, but the good ones get past that and move on to better things. Can Trump do that? I'll know for sure four years from now when I can review what he actually did while in office.
Trump wouldn't have to look far to find someone better for the job than Gaetz.
Apparently mirth has left the forum.Sigh... where did the humor & satire go?
igh... where did the humor & satire go?
Well, as a lawyer, you should be concerned about what cases that were brought against Trump and how the laws were used in novel interpretations (never before in US jurisprudence). But since you admitted in a previous post that you only get your information from the media and not the court filings, how could possibly know the facts?LOL, you are again trotting what the far right talking heads say with out the evidence to back it up. So long as the prosecutions against Trump were supported by sufficient evidence to get past a motion to dismiss there wasn't anything wrong with prosecuting it. If there wasn't the evidence then they should never pursued it in the first place.
SUPREME, COURT OF THE STATE, OF NE,!r YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORI PART 59THE, PE,OPLE, OF THE STATE, OF NE,W YORK DECISION AND ORDE,Ragarnst Ind. No. 71543/2023DONALD J. TRUMP,Defendant.HON. JUAN M. MERCHAN AJ.S.C.:
On November 19, 2024, this Court received separate submissions from Defendant and the District Attorney of New York County ('DANY' ot the "PEOPLE"), seeking various forms of reliefin connection with the above-captioned matter. The respective applications are decided as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Defendant's tequest for leave to file a motion to dismisspursuant to Criminal Procedure Law ("CPL') S 210.40 is GRANTED;
and it is further ORDERED that the joint request for a motion schedule is GRANTED.
Defendant's motionis due by the close of business Monday, Decembet 2,2024. The People's response is due by the close of business Monday, December 9,2024. The Court will not accept teply briefs;
and it is further ORDERED that the application to stay decision on Defendant's CPL S 330.30(1) motion is GRANTED pending receipt of the papers from all parties submitted in accotdance with the modonschedule noted above;
https://www.newsmax.com/getattachme...ple-v-DJT-11-22-24-Order.pdf.aspx;?lang=en-USand it is furtherORDERED that the joint application for ^ stay of sentencing is GRANTED to the extentthat the November 26,2024, date is adjourned.The above constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
The graphic is much too small to read the caption of the cartoon. I tried increasing the size of it in a graphics program but the image resolution was too low to make the words readable.
The graphic is much too small to read the caption of the cartoon
I do as well"He'll do a lot more damage this way."
Anybody else having that issue?
nope.